Eaton – Eaton accelerates sustainability impact with 40% emissions reduction and $2.1B in R&D investment
- Reduced operational GHG emissions 40% since 2018
- 86% of sites now zero waste to landfill, with continued progress in water stewardship
- 96% of new products achieve ‘Performer’ rating—Eaton’s standard for improved sustainability product performance
- Invested $2.1B in research and development
DUBLIN – Intelligent power management company Eaton (NYSE:ETN) today announced its 2025 Sustainability Report, highlighting measurable progress and a sharper focus on driving impact at scale. As global power management demands become more complex, Eaton is advancing solutions that help customers operate more efficiently, strengthen resilience and reduce their environmental impact—while continuing to enhance transparency and accountability across its operations.
Highlights from Eaton’s sustainability report include:
- Reduced Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions by 40% since 2018, up from 35% in 2024, with continued progress across the value chain
- 86% of sites certified as zero waste to landfill, with water mitigation measures implemented at water-stressed sites
- 96% of new products achieved a ‘Performer’ rating—Eaton’s standard for improved sustainability product performance
- Invested $2.1B in research and development of products and solutions that can enhance energy efficiency, improve safety, asset productivity and cost of ownership, among other customer requirements, since 2020, up from $1.7B in 2024, and progressing toward its goal to invest $3B by 2030.
The report also outlines updated sustainability goals reflecting areas where the company can accelerate change at scale, while reaffirming existing commitments such as its Science Based Target initiative (SBTi)-validated net-zero emissions target for 2050.
“This report reflects the real, consistent progress we’re making—and how that progress is translating into practical solutions for our customers,” said Harold Jones, chief of staff and chief sustainability officer, Eaton. “As global demand for power accelerates, we’re focused on where we can have the greatest impact—helping customers use power more efficiently, strengthen resilience and reduce their environmental footprint, while continuing to reduce our own impact and hold ourselves accountable.”
SourceEaton
EMR Analysis
More information on Eaton: See full profile on EMR Executive Services
More information on Paulo Ruiz Sternadt (Chief Executive Officer, Eaton): See the full profile on EMR Executive Services
More information on David Foster (Senior Leadership Team – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Eaton): See full profile on EMR Executive Services
More information on Eaton’s 2030 Growth Strategy (Lead, Invest and Execute for Growth) by Eaton: See full profile on EMR Executive Services
More information on the Sustainability Strategy and Sustainability Report 2025 by Eaton: See the full profile on EMR Executive Services
More information on Harold Jones (Senior Leadership Team – Chief Sustainability Officer and Executive Vice President, Eaton Business System (EBS), Eaton): See the full profile on EMR Executive Services
More information on Zero Waste to Landfill Certification by Zero Waste International Alliance (ZWIA): https://zwia.org/ + Zero Waste International Alliance, the internationally recognized online source for Zero Waste standards, policies and best practices for communities and businesses.
Working towards a world without waste through public education and practical application of Zero Waste principles.
The Zero Waste International Alliance was formed in 2003 to promote positive alternatives to landfill and incineration and to raise community awareness of the social and economic benefits to be gained when wasted materials are regarded as resources which can create both employment and business opportunities.
The simple technology and methods required to achieve Zero Waste exist in every community around the world. The Zero Waste International Alliance can connect you to leaders in the field who can provide your community with the models, the projects, the people and the means to help you develop Zero Waste as your ultimate goal.
The Zero Waste International Alliance:
- initiates and facilitates research and information sharing for the promotion of Zero Waste
- builds capacity to effectively implement Zero Waste
- sets standards for evaluating the achievement of Zero Waste
The Zero Waste International Alliance operates at the international, national and local level and involves all sectors of society.
More information on The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi): https://sciencebasedtargets.org/ + The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is a global body enabling businesses to set ambitious emissions reductions targets in line with the latest climate science. It is focused on accelerating companies across the world to halve emissions before 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions before 2050.
There are two main types of science-based targets: near-term and net-zero. Near-term targets aim to address emissions reductions over the next 5-10 years, whereas net-zero targets include reductions of 90% or more no later than 2050.
The initiative is a collaboration between CDP, the United Nations Global Compact, World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and one of the We Mean Business Coalition commitments. The SBTi defines and promotes best practice in science-based target setting, offers resources and guidance to reduce barriers to adoption, and independently assesses and approves companies’ targets.
- Defines and promotes best practices in emissions reductions and net-zero targets in line with climate science.
- Provides target setting methods and guidance to companies to set science-based targets in line with the latest climate science.
- Includes a team of experts to provide companies with independent assessment and validation of targets.
- Serves as the lead partner of the Business Ambition for 1.5°C campaign, an urgent call to action from a global coalition of UN agencies, business and industry leaders that mobilizes companies to set net-zero science-based targets in line with a 1.5 degrees C future.
More information on David Kennedy (Chief Executive Officer, SBTi): https://sciencebasedtargets.org/about-us/the-team + https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-kennedy-1000a3262/
More information on Net Zero by 2050 by the United Nations: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition + Put simply, net zero means cutting greenhouse gas emissions to as close to zero as possible, with any remaining emissions re-absorbed from the atmosphere, by oceans and forests for instance.
Currently, the Earth is already about 1.1°C warmer than it was in the late 1800s, and emissions continue to rise. To keep global warming to no more than 1.5°C – as called for in the Paris Agreement – emissions need to be reduced by 45% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.
More than 140 countries, including the biggest polluters – China, the United States, India and the European Union – have set a net-zero target, covering about 88% of global emissions. More than 9,000 companies, over 1000 cities, more than 1000 educational institutions, and over 600 financial institutions have joined the Race to Zero, pledging to take rigorous, immediate action to halve global emissions by 2030.
More information on Net Zero by 2050 by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi): https://sciencebasedtargets.org/net-zero + The SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard is the world’s only framework for corporate net-zero target setting in line with climate science. It includes the guidance, criteria, and recommendations companies need to set science-based net-zero targets consistent with limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C.
UN vs. SBTi:
- UN targets nations, while SBTi focuses on companies. UN sets a broad goal, while SBTI provides a detailed framework for target setting.
- Both aim to achieve net zero emissions and limit warming to 1.5°C. The UN sets the overall direction, and SBTi helps businesses translate that goal into actionable plans.
Key components of the Corporate Net-Zero Standard:
- Near-term targets: Rapid, deep cuts to direct and indirect value-chain emissions must be the overarching priority for companies. Companies must set near-term science-based targets to roughly halve emission before 2030. This is the most effective, scientifically-sound way of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C.
- Long-term targets: Companies must set long-term science-based targets. Companies must cut all possible – usually more than 90% – of emissions before 2050.
- Neutralize residual emissions: After a company has achieved its long-term target and cut emissions by more than 90%, it must use permanent carbon removal and storage to counterbalance the final 10% or more of residual emissions that cannot be eliminated. A company is only considered to have reached net-zero when it has achieved its long-term science-based target and neutralized any residual emissions.
- Beyond Value Chain Mitigation (BVCM): Businesses should invest now in actions to reduce and remove emissions outside of their value chains in addition to near- and long-term science-based targets.
EMR Additional Notes:
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2):
- The primary greenhouse gas emitted through human activities. Carbon dioxide enters the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil), solid waste, biomass (e.g. wood), and also as a result of certain industrial chemical reactions (e.g. cement production).
- Carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere (or “sequestered”) when it is absorbed by plants as part of the biological carbon cycle and through ocean absorption and geological processes.
- CO₂ is naturally part of the carbon cycle, but human activities have significantly increased its concentration in the atmosphere.
- Biogenic Carbon Dioxide (CO2):
- Biogenic CO₂ and fossil-derived CO₂ are chemically identical molecules.
- The distinction is not chemical, but source-based:
- Biogenic carbon: CO₂ released from organic materials such as plants, wood, soil, and biomass that were recently part of the natural carbon cycle.
- Fossil carbon: CO₂ released from fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas), which were stored underground for millions of years.
- CO2e (Carbon Dioxide Equivalent):
- CO₂e means “carbon dioxide equivalent”.
- It is a standardized climate metric used to express the total climate impact of multiple greenhouse gases in a single standardized unit.
- CO₂e converts all greenhouse gases (such as methane and nitrous oxide) into the amount of CO₂ that would have the same global warming effect over a defined time period.
- Formula: CO₂e = mass of gas × Global Warming Potential (GWP)
- Carbon dioxide equivalents are commonly expressed as million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents, abbreviated as MMTCDE.
- The carbon dioxide equivalent for a gas is derived by multiplying the tonnes of the gas by the associated GWP: MMTCDE = (million metric tonnes of a gas) * (GWP of the gas).
- For example, the GWP for methane is 25 and for nitrous oxide 298. This means that emissions of 1 million metric tonnes of methane and nitrous oxide respectively is equivalent to emissions of 25 and 298 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide.
- Carbon Footprint:
- There is no universally agreed definition of what a carbon footprint is.
- The most widely used definition (GHG Protocol) describes it as: “The total set of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused directly and indirectly through an organization’s operations and value chain.”
- A carbon footprint is the total amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused directly and indirectly by an individual, organization, product, or activity.
- It is typically measured in CO₂e.
- Decarbonization:
- Reduction of carbon dioxide emissions through the use of low-carbon energy sources and improved efficiency, with the goal of reducing overall greenhouse gas emissions.
- Decarbonization typically refers to system-wide transition, not only emission reduction at a single source.
- Carbon Credits or Carbon Offsets:
- Carbon credits are tradable certificates representing the right to emit one metric ton of CO₂e.
- They are part of cap-and-trade systems, where:
- A cap limits total emissions
- Companies receive or buy allowances
- Excess credits can be traded
- Offsets are often linked to external projects that reduce or remove emissions (e.g. reforestation, renewable energy).
- Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) – Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS):
- CCS involves capturing CO₂ emissions from industrial processes and storing them permanently in geological formations (e.g. underground reservoirs).
- CCUS adds a utilization step, where captured CO₂ is reused as a feedstock (e.g. fuels, chemicals, building materials).
- CCS = storage only, CCUS = storage + reuse.
- Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) or Durable Carbon Removal:
- CDR refers to methods that actively remove CO₂ from the atmosphere and store it for long periods in geological, biological, or mineral form.
- Examples include:
- Direct Air Capture (DAC)
- Bioenergy with Carbon Capture (BECCS)
- Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW)
- CDR creates net negative emissions when removal exceeds emissions.
- Direct Air Capture (DAC):
- Technologies that extract CO2 directly from the atmosphere at any location, unlike carbon capture which is generally carried out at the point of emissions, such as a steel plant.
- Constraints like costs and energy requirements as well as the potential for pollution make DAC a less desirable option for CO2 reduction. Its larger land footprint when compared to other mitigation strategies like carbon capture and storage systems (CCS) also put it at a disadvantage.
- Direct Air Capture and Storage (DACCS):
- Climate technology that removes carbon dioxide (CO2) directly from the ambient atmosphere using large fans and chemical processes to bind with the CO2.
- Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS):
- Technology that generates energy from biomass while capturing and storing the resulting CO₂.
- Because biomass absorbs CO₂ while growing, BECCS can result in net negative emissions.
- Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW):
- Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technique that accelerates the natural process of rock weathering by grinding silicate rocks into dust and spreading it on land, typically agricultural fields. This process uses rainwater to convert atmospheric carbon dioxide into mineral carbonates, which are then stored long-term in soils, groundwater, and oceans.
- Limits of Carbon Dioxide Storage:
- Carbon storage is not endless; the Earth’s capacity for permanently storing vast amounts of captured carbon, particularly in geological formations, is limited, potentially reaching a critical limit of 1,460 gigatonnes at around 2200, though storage durations vary significantly depending on the method, from decades for some biological methods to potentially millions of years for others like mineralization. While some methods offer very long-term storage, the sheer volume needed to meet climate targets requires scaling up storage significantly beyond current capacity, raising concerns about the available volume over time.
- Carbon Impregnation:
- Carbon impregnation is the process of treating activated carbon with chemical agents (such as metals, acids, or bases) to enhance its ability to adsorb specific, hard-to-remove pollutants. By loading substances like silver, sulfur, or potassium hydroxide into its pores, this material combines physical adsorption with chemical reaction for improved, targeted filtration in water and air. This is a materials engineering process, not a climate accounting concept.
- Global Warming:
- Global warming is the long-term heating of Earth’s climate system observed since the pre-industrial period (between 1850 and 1900) due to human activities, primarily fossil fuel burning, which increases heat-trapping greenhouse gas levels in Earth’s atmosphere.
- Global Warming Potential (GWP):
- A measure of how much heat a greenhouse gas traps in the atmosphere compared to CO₂ over a specific time period (commonly 100 years).
- CO₂ has a GWP of 1.
- GWP is the scientific basis for converting gases into CO₂e.
- GWP was developed to allow comparisons of the global warming impacts of different gases.
- Greenhouse Gas (GHG):
- Any gas that absorbs and traps infrared radiation in the atmosphere, contributing to the greenhouse effect.
- Main GHGs include:
- CO₂
- Methane (CH₄)
- Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
- Fluorinated gases
- Water vapor is a GHG but is not directly controlled by human emissions at scale.

- GHG Protocol Corporate Standard Scope 1, 2 and 3: https://ghgprotocol.org/ + The GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard provides requirements and guidance for companies and other organizations preparing a corporate-level GHG emissions inventory. Scope 1 and 2 are typically mandatory for companies that are required to report their emissions by national or regional regulations. The GHG Protocol itself is a voluntary standard.
- Scope 1: Direct emissions:
- Direct emissions from company-owned and controlled resources. In other words, emissions are released into the atmosphere as a direct result of a set of activities, at a firm level. It is divided into four categories:
- Stationary combustion (e.g from fuels, heating sources). All fuels that produce GHG emissions must be included in scope 1.
- Mobile combustion is all vehicles owned or controlled by a firm, burning fuel (e.g. cars, vans, trucks). The increasing use of “electric” vehicles (EVs), means that some of the organisation’s fleets could fall into Scope 2 emissions.
- Fugitive emissions are leaks from greenhouse gases (e.g. refrigeration, air conditioning units). It is important to note that refrigerant gases are a thousand times more dangerous than CO2 emissions. Companies are encouraged to report these emissions.
- Process emissions are released during industrial processes, and on-site manufacturing (e.g. production of CO2 during cement manufacturing, factory fumes, chemicals).
- Direct emissions from company-owned and controlled resources. In other words, emissions are released into the atmosphere as a direct result of a set of activities, at a firm level. It is divided into four categories:
- Scope 2: Indirect emissions – owned:
- Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased energy, from a utility provider. In other words, all GHG emissions released in the atmosphere, from the consumption of purchased electricity, steam, heat and cooling. For most organisations, electricity will be the unique source of scope 2 emissions. Simply stated, the energy consumed falls into two scopes: Scope 2 covers the electricity consumed by the end-user. Scope 3 covers the energy used by the utilities during transmission and distribution (T&D losses).
- Scope 3: Indirect emissions – not owned:
- Indirect emissions – not included in scope 2 – that occur in the value chain of the reporting company, including both upstream and downstream emissions. In other words, emissions are linked to the company’s operations. According to the GHG protocol, scope 3 emissions are separated into 15 categories.
- Scope 1: Direct emissions:


